Volume 6, Issue 3 (10-2022)
EBHPME 2022, 6(3): 197-206 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khosravizade O, Ahadinezhad B, Sheikh B S. The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Innovative Performance with the Mediating Role of Qazvin Health Staff’s Empowerment: A Path Analysis. EBHPME 2022; 6 (3) :197-206
URL: http://jebhpme.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-370-en.html
URL: http://jebhpme.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-370-en.html
Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , sa_sheykh@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1047 Views)
Background: Nowadays, since many health care organizations are facing a crisis of declining productivity and labor force stagnation, productivity can be improved through identifying and strengthening the components affecting the labor force productivity and performance. Thus, the present study was aimed at determining the effect of intellectual capital on innovative performance with the mediating role of health staff’s empowerment in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: This is a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study carried out in 2021. Three hundred and four staff of the Health Department and Health Networks participated in the research by the available sampling method. The Bontis questionnaire was employed for measuring the intellectual capital, the Spritzer questionnaire for measuring staff’s empowerment, and the Huang and Li questionnaire for measuring innovative performance. Moreover, for preliminary data analysis, SPSS25 Software was used as well as AMOS software for structural equation modeling at a significance level of 0.050 %.
Results: The results of the path coefficient among the model variables on each path, corresponding to the research hypotheses, are positive, revealing a positive relationship among the research variables. The path coefficient of the direct relationship between intellectual capital and innovative performance was equal to 0.767 (P-value < 0.001). Moreover, the relationship between intellectual capital and empowerment was equal to 0.306, and between empowerment and innovative performance was equal to 0.153, both of which were significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, indices of fit including NFI = 0.652, RMSEA = 0.064, GFI = 0.710, and CFI = 0.769 exhibited a relatively good fit of the final model.
Conclusion: Given the direct relationship between model variables, the University of Medical Sciences’ managers and health officials should provide the bed for improving the capacity of human resources and innovative performance through developing intellectual capital besides creating a platform to play an effective role in the organization. Accordingly, effective and innovative performance based on responding to the human resources’ changing needs in all sectors may be imagined.
Methods: This is a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study carried out in 2021. Three hundred and four staff of the Health Department and Health Networks participated in the research by the available sampling method. The Bontis questionnaire was employed for measuring the intellectual capital, the Spritzer questionnaire for measuring staff’s empowerment, and the Huang and Li questionnaire for measuring innovative performance. Moreover, for preliminary data analysis, SPSS25 Software was used as well as AMOS software for structural equation modeling at a significance level of 0.050 %.
Results: The results of the path coefficient among the model variables on each path, corresponding to the research hypotheses, are positive, revealing a positive relationship among the research variables. The path coefficient of the direct relationship between intellectual capital and innovative performance was equal to 0.767 (P-value < 0.001). Moreover, the relationship between intellectual capital and empowerment was equal to 0.306, and between empowerment and innovative performance was equal to 0.153, both of which were significant (p < 0.001). Furthermore, indices of fit including NFI = 0.652, RMSEA = 0.064, GFI = 0.710, and CFI = 0.769 exhibited a relatively good fit of the final model.
Conclusion: Given the direct relationship between model variables, the University of Medical Sciences’ managers and health officials should provide the bed for improving the capacity of human resources and innovative performance through developing intellectual capital besides creating a platform to play an effective role in the organization. Accordingly, effective and innovative performance based on responding to the human resources’ changing needs in all sectors may be imagined.
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Healt care Management
Received: 2021/12/5 | Accepted: 2022/10/18 | Published: 2022/10/18
Received: 2021/12/5 | Accepted: 2022/10/18 | Published: 2022/10/18
References
1. Ahmadian M, Ghorbani R. Investigating the relationship between intellectual capital and organizational performance: A case study of the ministry of economic affairs and finance. Economic Journal. 2014; 13(11,12): 111-30. [In Persian]
2. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2008; 29(2): 147-54. [DOI: 10.1002/job.515]
3. Bontis N. Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management. 1999. [DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.1999.002780]
4. Bontis N. Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision. 1998; 36(2): 63-76. [DOI: 10.1108/00251749810204142]
5. Bonias D, Bartram T, Leggat SG, Stanton P. Does psychological empowerment mediate the relationship between high performance work systems and patient care quality in hospitals?. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2010; 48(3): 319-37. [DOI: 10.1177/1038411110381667]
6. Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal. 1995; 38(5): 1442-65. [DOI: 10.2307/256865]
7. Erajirad R, Lotfi Khatoonabad F. The mediating role of empowerment in the relationship between innovative behavior and creativity. Scientific Journal of Innovation and Creativity in the Humanities. 2019; 9(1): 1-22. [In Persian]
8. Hosseini MH, Alizadeh T, Norouzi Ajirlou R, Moghadam M. Investigating the influence of intellectual capital on organizational performance with organizational learning mediating. bimonthly of education strategies in medical sciences. Scientific Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2020; 12(6): 19-27. [In Persian]
9. Rogers EM, Singhal A, Quinlan MM. Diffusion of innovations. An integrated approach to communication theory and research: Routledge; New York, 2014.
10. Manteghi M, Tavakoli Gh, Nazari Y, kamali, A. The mediating role of resilience and employee empowerment in the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative performance. Organizational Behavior Studies. 2016; 5(1): 229-55. [In Persian]
11. 11. Esfahani AA, Malekpour K, Tadayon AH, Abbasi Farajzadeh M. The relationship between intellectual capital with human resource productivity and job performance from the viewpoint of the military hospital staff. Journal of Military Medicine. 2019; 20(6): 674-84. [In Persian]
12. Sheihaki Tash M, Ahang F, Raeesi A. Impact of Social Capital on Psychological Empowermen with the Role of Mediating Intellectual Capital. Public Management Research. 2019; 12(44): 237-59. [In Persian]
13. Abazeed RAM. The impact of intellectual capital dimensions on organizational performance of public hospitals in Jordan. Global Journal of Management and Business. 2017; 17(5): 42-52.
14. Aidi M, Sadehmiri M. Assessing the status of intellectual capital in Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Scientific Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. 2019; 26(5): 172-9. [In Persian] [DOI: 10.29252/sjimu.26.5.172]
15. Bahadori M, Teimourzadeh E, Masteri Farahani H. Factors affecting human resources productivity in a military health organization. Iranian Journal of Military Medicine. 2013; 15(1): 77-86.
16. Ahadinezhad B, Khosravizadeh O, Vahdati F, Mohammadkhani M, Soheylirad R, Sarikhani S. Investigating the relationship between Management Style and Market Orientation in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. EBHPME. 2022; 6(2): 126-36. DOI: . [DOI: 10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9944]
17. Aghajanzadeh H, Kuche Baghi P. Investigating the relationship between knowledge management and intellectual capital in Asia insurance company in Tehran. Tehran; 2011.
18. Ahmadi G. Relationship between organizational support and job motivation with empowerment of Shiraz Oil Refining Company employees. Tehran; 2015.
19. Jamshidi R, Shetab Booshehri N, Khatibi A. Relationship of intellectual capital with psychological empowerment and professional commitment of sports selected and successful federation experts. Sport Management Studies. 2019; 11(57): 177-96. [In Persian] [DOI: 10.22089/ SMRJ.2017.4453.1855]
20. Ghaleei AR, Mohajeran B, Miraghaie AA. Survey of structural relationship of intellectual capital, psychological empowerment, organizational learning and performance. Journal of Hospital. 2018; 17(1): 65-76. [In Persian]
21. De Spiegelaere S, Van Gyes G, Vandekerckhove S, Van Hootegem G. Job design and innovative work behavior: Enabling innovation through active or low-strain jobs?. 2012; 17(4): 1-20. [DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.2158618]
22. Faryadl, Khorakian A, Nazemi SH. Investigating the effect of psychological empowerment on employees’ innovative behavior according to their job motivation. Quarterly Journal of Development and Transformation Management. 2016; 25 (25): 17-26. [In Persian]
23. Hashemi Sheikh Shabani SE, Aslanpour Jokandan M, Naami AZ. Mediating role of Job engagement in the relationship between psychological climate and core self evaluations with task performance and intention to leave. Quarterly Journal of Career & Organizational Counseling. 2012; 4(11): 13-32. [In Persian]
24. Jahanian R, Hadadi T. The relationship between intellectual capital and human resources creativity and innovation in an organization. Innovation & Creativity in Human Science. 2015; 5(1): 65-92. [In Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
